code-review-and-quality
Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch.
Best for PR review workflowsWorks with GitHubLow risk
⌘source
- author
@addyosmani- language
- Shell
★17kstars
2.2kforks
Apr 18, 2026
✦overview.md
Key Features
- ·Multi-axis review covering correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance
- ·Approval standard based on improving overall code health, not perfection
- ·Mandatory review before merging any change
- ·Evaluates code against project conventions and requirements
Use Cases
- →Reviewing pull requests before merging to main branch
- →Evaluating code produced by AI agents or other models
- →Assessing code quality after feature implementation completion
- →Reviewing bug fixes and associated regression tests
- →Evaluating refactored code before integration
Best for
- ✓PR review workflows
- ✓quality gate enforcement
- ✓team code review processes
name
code-review-and-quality
description
Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch.
Code Review and Quality
Overview
Multi-dimensional code review with quality gates. Every change gets reviewed before merge — no exceptions. Review covers five axes: correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance.
The approval standard: Approve a change when it definitely improves overall code health, even if it isn't perfect. Perfect code doesn't exist — the goal is continuous improvement. Don't block a change because it isn't exactly how you would have written it. If it improves the codebase and follows the project's conventions, approve it.
When to Use
- Before merging any PR or change
- After completing a feature implementation
- When another agent or model produced code you need to evaluate
- When refactoring existing code
- After any bug fix (review both the fix and the regression test)
The Five-Axis Review
Every review evaluates code across these dimensions:
1. Correctness
Does the code do what it claims to do?
- Does it match the spec or task requirements?
- Are edge cases handled (null, empty, boundary values)?
- Are error paths handled (not just the happy path)?
$install
1-click copynpx skills add addyosmani/agent-skills --skill code-review-and-qualitySafety assessment
★
Clarity score
How clear and easy to understand the SKILL.md instructions are, rated from 1 to 5.
5/ 5
excellentVery clear and well structured, with almost no room for misunderstanding.
◎
Actionability score
How directly an agent can act on the SKILL.md instructions, rated from 1 to 5.
5/ 5
very highHighly actionable with clear, concrete steps that an agent can follow directly.