design-critique
Get honest design feedback. Upload any visual — UI design, logos, photos, graphics, PDFs — and get prioritized critique: what's broken, what works, what to polish. Theory-backed analysis using 11 frameworks.
Best for design teamsWorks with GitHubLow risk
⌘source
- author
@LeoYeAI- language
- Python
★2kstars
306forks
May 6, 2026
✦overview.md
Key Features
- ·Theory-backed critique using 11 frameworks
- ·Priority-ordered action list (critical → important → polish)
- ·Supports UI, logos, photos, graphics, PDFs, URLs
- ·Honest, actionable feedback linked to violated principles
Use Cases
- →Upload a mobile app screenshot for usability and hierarchy critique before launch
- →Share a logo concept to evaluate gestalt and visual balance
- →Review a marketing graphic for color, contrast, and readability
- →Get a second opinion on a web UI design from a theory perspective
Best for
- ✓design teams
- ✓solo designers
- ✓product managers reviewing mockups
Not ideal for
- !code reviews
- !technical architecture feedback
FAQs
name
designers-eye
description
Get honest design feedback. Upload any visual — UI design, logos, photos, graphics, PDFs — and get prioritized critique: what's broken, what works, what to polish. Theory-backed analysis using 11 frameworks.
author:Chris Couriard
version:2.0.4
Designers Eye — Professional Design Critique
A critical eye for design. Share a screenshot, image, or website URL and get honest, theory-backed feedback prioritized by impact.
How It Works
Input: Any visual file — UI design (app & web), logos, photos, graphics, PDFs (as images), anything visual. Share directly in chat.
Analysis: Examined through 11 rigorous frameworks covering visual fundamentals, information hierarchy, usability, and platform expectations.
Output: Priority-ordered action list (critical → important → polish) with specific fixes linked to violated principles.
How to Use
Share any image. That's it. UI design, logos, graphics, photos, PDFs exported as images, Figma frames — anything you can see gets the same treatment: theory-backed critique ranked by severity and actionability.
Analysis Framework
Every critique examines 11 dimensions:
1. Gestalt Principles — How elements group and relate (proximity, similarity, continuity, closure, figure/ground, common fate, prägnanz, uniform connectedness).
2. Visual Hierarchy — What's the focal point? Are reading paths clear? Do size, weight, colour, position, and whitespace align?
$install
1-click copynpx skills add LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills --skill design-critiqueSafety assessment
★
Clarity score
How clear and easy to understand the SKILL.md instructions are, rated from 1 to 5.
4/ 5
very goodClear and well structured, with only minor parts that might need a second read.
◎
Actionability score
How directly an agent can act on the SKILL.md instructions, rated from 1 to 5.
4/ 5
highMostly actionable with clear steps; only a few small gaps remain.