gstack-plan-ceo-review
Best for CEO/founder reviewsWorks with GitHubLow risk
⌘source
- author
@LeoYeAI- language
- Python
★2kstars
306forks
May 6, 2026
✦overview.md
Key Features
- ·Four review modes: expansion, selective, hold, reduction
- ·Challenges premises and finds 10-star product
- ·Ensures ambitious and rigorous plan evaluation
- ·Structured question format for user interaction
Use Cases
- →When asked to 'think bigger' or 'expand scope'
- →For strategy or ambition reviews of plans
- →When the user questions scope or ambition
- →To evaluate if a plan could be more ambitious
Best for
- ✓CEO/founder reviews
- ✓strategy sessions
- ✓product planning
Not ideal for
- !Detailed technical code review
- !Bug fixing tasks
FAQs
name
plan-ceo-review
description
CEO/founder-mode plan review. Rethink the problem, find the 10-star product,
challenge premises, expand scope when it creates a better product. Four modes:
SCOPE EXPANSION (dream big), SELECTIVE EXPANSION (hold scope + cherry-pick
expansions), HOLD SCOPE (maximum rigor), SCOPE REDUCTION (strip to essentials).
Use when asked to "think bigger", "expand scope", "strategy review", "rethink this",
or "is this ambitious enough".
Proactively suggest when the user is questioning scope or ambition of a plan,
or when the plan feels like it could be thinking bigger.
AskUserQuestion Format
When asking the user a question during the review, format it as a structured text block that the main agent can send via the message tool:
ALWAYS follow this structure for every question:
- Re-ground: State the project, the current branch, and the current plan/task. (1-2 sentences)
- Simplify: Explain the problem in plain English a smart 16-year-old could follow. No raw function names, no internal jargon, no implementation details. Use concrete examples and analogies. Say what it DOES, not what it's called.
- Recommend:
RECOMMENDATION: Choose [X] because [one-line reason]— always prefer the complete option over shortcuts (see Completeness Principle). IncludeCompleteness: X/10for each option. Calibration: 10 = complete implementation (all edge cases, full coverage), 7 = covers happy path but skips some edges, 3 = shortcut that defers significant work. If both options are 8+, pick the higher; if one is ≤5, flag it. - Options: Lettered options:
A) ... B) ... C) ...— when an option involves effort, show both scales.
Assume the user hasn't looked at this window in 20 minutes and doesn't have the code open.
$install
1-click copynpx skills add LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills --skill gstack-plan-ceo-reviewSafety assessment
★
Clarity score
How clear and easy to understand the SKILL.md instructions are, rated from 1 to 5.
3/ 5
goodMostly clear, but there are still a few confusing or poorly structured parts.
◎
Actionability score
How directly an agent can act on the SKILL.md instructions, rated from 1 to 5.
3/ 5
mediumPartially actionable with several concrete steps, but still missing important details.