rebuttal
Use when a quest already has a paper, draft, or review package and the task is to map reviewer feedback into experiments, manuscript deltas, and a durable rebuttal / revision response.
Best for Academic researchersWorks with GitHubLow risk
⌘source
- author
@ResearAI- language
- TypeScript
★2.3kstars
246forks
Apr 19, 2026
✦overview.md
Key Features
- ·Maps reviewer feedback into experiments and manuscript changes
- ·Creates durable rebuttal/revision response artifacts
- ·Focuses on smallest honest revision program
- ·Follows interaction discipline with progress updates
Use Cases
- →Responding to reviewer feedback on academic papers
- →Managing manuscript revisions during peer review
- →Creating structured rebuttal documents for journal submissions
Best for
- ✓Academic researchers
- ✓Authors in peer review process
- ✓Revision-focused writing tasks
Not ideal for
- !Initial paper drafting
- !Non-review writing tasks
- !One-off content creation
FAQs
name
rebuttal
description
Use when a quest already has a paper, draft, or review package and the task is to map reviewer feedback into experiments, manuscript deltas, and a durable rebuttal / revision response.
skill_role:companion
Rebuttal
Use this skill when the quest is in review, revision, or rebuttal mode. The goal is to turn reviewer pressure into the smallest honest revision program that can actually be executed.
This is not the same as ordinary write.
The task is no longer “draft the paper from evidence”.
The task is “respond to concrete reviewer pressure with the smallest honest set of experiments, text changes, claim adjustments, and response artifacts”.
Interaction discipline
- Follow the shared interaction contract injected by the system prompt.
- For ordinary active work, prefer a concise progress update once work has crossed roughly 6 tool calls with a human-meaningful delta, and do not drift beyond roughly 12 tool calls or about 8 minutes without a user-visible update.
- Message templates are references only. Adapt to the actual context and vary wording so updates feel natural and non-robotic.
- If a threaded user reply arrives, interpret it relative to the latest rebuttal progress update before assuming the task changed completely.
$install
1-click copynpx skills add ResearAI/DeepScientist --skill rebuttalSafety assessment
★
Clarity score
How clear and easy to understand the SKILL.md instructions are, rated from 1 to 5.
1/ 5
poorThe SKILL.md content is hard to understand and quite ambiguous.
◎
Actionability score
How directly an agent can act on the SKILL.md instructions, rated from 1 to 5.
1/ 5
not actionableThe SKILL.md is hard to act on; an agent would not know what to do.