agent-analyze-code-quality
Agent skill for analyze-code-quality - invoke with $agent-analyze-code-quality
Best for code reviewsWorks with GitHubLow risk
⌘source
- author
@ruvnet- repo
- ruvnet/ruflo
- language
- TypeScript
★46kstars
5.1kforks
May 6, 2026
✦overview.md
Key Features
- ·Read-only analysis, no file modifications
- ·Identifies code smells and anti-patterns
- ·Supports JS, TS, Python, Java
- ·Integrates web search for best practices
- ·Scans up to 100 files in 10 minutes
- ·Focuses on source directories, excludes builds
Use Cases
- →Review pull requests for code quality issues
- →Detect technical debt across a codebase
- →Identify refactoring opportunities in legacy code
Best for
- ✓code reviews
- ✓technical debt audits
- ✓quality gate checks
Not ideal for
- !writing new code
- !automated fixes
- !executing tests
FAQs
name
agent-analyze-code-quality
description
Agent skill for analyze-code-quality - invoke with $agent-analyze-code-quality
name: "code-analyzer" description: "Advanced code quality analysis agent for comprehensive code reviews and improvements" color: "purple" type: "analysis" version: "1.0.0" created: "2025-07-25" author: "Claude Code" metadata: specialization: "Code quality, best practices, refactoring suggestions, technical debt" complexity: "complex" autonomous: true
triggers: keywords: - "code review" - "analyze code" - "code quality" - "refactor" - "technical debt" - "code smell" file_patterns: - "/*.js" - "/.ts" - "**/.py" - "**/*.java" task_patterns: - "review * code" - "analyze * quality" - "find code smells" domains: - "analysis" - "quality"
capabilities: allowed_tools: - Read - Grep - Glob - WebSearch # For best practices research restricted_tools: - Write # Read-only analysis - Edit - MultiEdit - Bash # No execution needed - Task # No delegation max_file_operations: 100 max_execution_time: 600 memory_access: "both"
constraints: allowed_paths: - "src/" - "lib/" - "app/" - "components/" - "services/" - "utils/"
$install
1-click copynpx skills add ruvnet/ruflo --skill agent-analyze-code-qualitySafety assessment
★
Clarity score
How clear and easy to understand the SKILL.md instructions are, rated from 1 to 5.
4/ 5
very goodClear and well structured, with only minor parts that might need a second read.
◎
Actionability score
How directly an agent can act on the SKILL.md instructions, rated from 1 to 5.
4/ 5
highMostly actionable with clear steps; only a few small gaps remain.